top of page
American Council of Aesthetic Medicine and Surgery Logo
American Council of Aesthetic Medicine and Surgery

Institutional Ratings & Benchmarking

The American Council of Aesthetic Medicine and Surgery (ACAMS) provides an independent institutional rating and benchmarking framework to support transparency, quality enhancement, and performance comparison within the field of aesthetic medicine and surgery.

ACAMS ratings are designed as quality indicators, not regulatory approvals.

Promoting Transparency, Performance & Continuous Improvement

Purpose of ACAMS Institutional Ratings
 
ACAMS institutional ratings aim to:

  • Encourage continuous quality improvement

  • Support informed professional and public decision-making

  • Benchmark institutions against defined performance indicators

  • Promote transparency and accountability
     

What ACAMS Institutional Ratings Represent
ACAMS ratings reflect:

  • Performance alignment with defined quality indicators

  • Commitment to professional and ethical standards

  • Continuous improvement efforts

Ratings are based on documented evidence and evaluation outcomes.
 
Key Rating Domains
ACAMS institutional ratings are based on multi-dimensional assessment, including:
 
1. Governance & Management

  • Leadership structure and accountability

  • Policy implementation and oversight

  • Quality assurance systems
     

2. Clinical Governance & Patient Safety
(For Clinics & Hospitals)

  • Safety protocols and infection control

  • Risk management and incident reporting

  • Ethical patient care practices
     

3. Education & Training Quality
(For Academies & Training Institutions)

  • Curriculum structure and learning outcomes

  • Assessment and evaluation systems

  • Faculty competence and teaching standards
     

4. Faculty & Professional Team

  • Credential verification

  • Experience and specialization

  • Ongoing professional development
     

5. Infrastructure & Facilities

  • Clinical or training infrastructure

  • Equipment adequacy and safety

  • Learning and patient care environment
     

6. Ethics, Transparency & Compliance

  • Ethical conduct and marketing practices

  • Compliance with ACAMS standards

  • Public information accuracy
     

Rating Methodology
ACAMS ratings are determined through:

  • Review of submitted documentation

  • Evaluation outcomes from accreditation or quality assessments

  • Periodic performance review (where applicable)
     

Ratings may be expressed as:

  • Tiered levels

  • Performance bands

  • Benchmark categories
     

Use of Ratings
Institutions may:

  • Display ACAMS rating status as permitted

  • Reference ratings in professional communications

Ratings must not:

  • Be represented as government approval

  • Be used to imply licensing or regulatory authority

  • Be misused in misleading advertising

 
Important Clarifications

  • ACAMS ratings are non-regulatory

  • Ratings do not authorize clinical practice

  • Ratings are subject to periodic review and update

Apply for Board Certification

Join a professional recognition framework aligned with quality education and ethical practice.

Apply for Accreditation

Apply for Board Certification

bottom of page